20 casinos15 cashiers opened27 coins counted Deutsch
Entry 6 of 20
The most interesting sentence of terms on this list: clause 18.1 names anyone paying in bitcoin explicitly, and asks for the document before the first bet.
Editorial team Beste Bitcoin Casinos Deutschland Updated 25 September 2026 Reading time 7 min
The most interesting sentence of terms on this list: clause 18.1 names anyone paying in bitcoin explicitly, and asks for the document before the first bet. Anyone choosing a house precisely because of bitcoin should know that sentence before depositing.
| Item | What was read |
|---|---|
| Licensing authority | Anjouan Gaming Board |
| Licence number | ALSI-202509073-FI2 |
| Status in the register | valid |
| Registered company | Metlait SRL |
| Date inside the number | September 2025 |
| Coins at the cashier | 10 |
| Profile of the house | Slots, live tables |
| Read on | 2026-09-02 |
An empty field means “not read” and never “does not exist”.
On the day it was read, 10 coins stood at the cashier, among them one value-stable coin (USDT). For a deposit that is the difference between an amount that changes value on the way and one that does not.
One point that matters equally at every house and appears on no front page: the cashier issues an address for exactly one network. The same coin runs on several networks, and a transfer on the wrong one does not arrive — that is the only mix-up on this route nobody can undo. The networks are listed on buying bitcoin.
The clause has a reference in the terms but names no figure. That is the middle of three tiers: you know where it stands, but not from what point it bites.
Why this clause gets so much room on this page: “casino without verification” is the most searched and least kept sentence in the trade. Practically every house reserves the right to check — the difference lies solely in how firmly it binds itself. The three tiers are set out on casinos without KYC.
No bonus was read for this house. The score carries a zero for it, and that is a statement about our sources rather than about the house.
What a bonus actually fails on is almost never the factor but the maximum stake during the turnover and the game weighting. Both are on the bonus page, together with the comparison of every offer that could be recomputed.
| Block | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | 20 / 20 | number, status and company found in the register |
| Cashier | 17 / 20 | 10 coins, at least one value-stable |
| Verification | 13 / 20 | clause with a reference, no figure |
| Bonus | 0 / 20 | no bonus read |
| Offering | 14 / 20 | Slots, live tables |
Total: 64 of 100. What is measured is not the quality of the games but how much of the way back out is fixed in writing before the first deposit. The whole scale is on the scoring page.
The two columns come from the same readings as the points above — they summarise them, they add nothing.
| In its favour | Against it |
|---|---|
| The verification rule is written out explicitly and without hedging | Document before the first bet — the earliest verification in this comparison |
| Ten coins, among them USDT | No bonus with published figures |
| Register entry with number, status and company | No in-house games with a checking mechanism |
Three questions that arise at Wild Fortune exactly as they do at every other house on this list: how old the register entry really is, what a recommendation in a forum is worth, where the figures on this site come from. The scale behind the score above is on the scoring page, the full ranking under all casinos.
The three entries whose score comes closest to this one. Closeness in the score means: roughly the same amount is known about these houses.
Ten coins, and two of them — Dash and Monero — barely appear anywhere else in this comparison.
Clause 12.5 separates age confirmation and identity check as two different things — few sets of terms do.
One of two entries with a quantified verification threshold: €2,000 of deposits.