CryptoGames Curaçao Gaming Authority · OGL/2024/1336/1047
Fourteen coins and a house built around its own games rather than around a bought-in slot catalogue.
20 casinos15 cashiers opened27 coins counted Deutsch
Entry 14 of 20
The second entry with a quantified threshold, and the only one that ties it to a named clause: 6.6, from €2,500 or the equivalent in cryptocurrency.
Editorial team Beste Bitcoin Casinos Deutschland Updated 25 September 2026 Reading time 7 min
The second entry with a quantified threshold, and the only one that ties it to a named clause: 6.6, from €2,500 or the equivalent in cryptocurrency. The cashier was not opened from this desk.
| Item | What was read |
|---|---|
| Licensing authority | Curaçao Gaming Authority |
| Licence number | OGL/2023/111/0069 |
| Status in the register | Active |
| Registered company | Moon Technologies B.V. |
| Date inside the number | 2023 |
| Coins at the cashier | cashier not opened |
| Profile of the house | Slots, live tables |
| Read on | not read |
An empty field means “not read” and never “does not exist”.
The cashier of this house was not opened from here, which is why no coin list stands against it in this comparison. That does not mean there is none.
One point that matters equally at every house and appears on no front page: the cashier issues an address for exactly one network. The same coin runs on several networks, and a transfer on the wrong one does not arrive — that is the only mix-up on this route nobody can undo. The networks are listed on buying bitcoin.
The clause names a figure — an amount or a deadline. That is the strongest form this commitment takes anywhere in this comparison: a player can point at a figure in a dispute, but not at “where necessary”. 3 of 20 houses write it that way.
Why this clause gets so much room on this page: “casino without verification” is the most searched and least kept sentence in the trade. Practically every house reserves the right to check — the difference lies solely in how firmly it binds itself. The three tiers are set out on casinos without KYC.
No bonus was read for this house. The score carries a zero for it, and that is a statement about our sources rather than about the house.
What a bonus actually fails on is almost never the factor but the maximum stake during the turnover and the game weighting. Both are on the bonus page, together with the comparison of every offer that could be recomputed.
| Block | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | 20 / 20 | number, status and company found in the register |
| Cashier | 0 / 20 | cashier not opened |
| Verification | 20 / 20 | clause with a figure |
| Bonus | 0 / 20 | no bonus read |
| Offering | 14 / 20 | Slots, live tables |
Total: 54 of 100. What is measured is not the quality of the games but how much of the way back out is fixed in writing before the first deposit. The whole scale is on the scoring page.
Three questions that arise at Bitcasino.io exactly as they do at every other house on this list: how old the register entry really is, what a recommendation in a forum is worth, where the figures on this site come from. The scale behind the score above is on the scoring page, the full ranking under all casinos.
The three entries whose score comes closest to this one. Closeness in the score means: roughly the same amount is known about these houses.
Fourteen coins and a house built around its own games rather than around a bought-in slot catalogue.
The narrowest cashier in this comparison — three coins, and precisely the three that work almost everywhere.
Thirteen coins, and the basket opens with the value-stable ones rather than with bitcoin — an order that says what is actually played here.